<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Network Forensics Blog &#187; Data Leakage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkforensics.com/category/data-leakage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkforensics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Move over China, here comes Russia</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/18/move-over-china-here-comes-russia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/18/move-over-china-here-comes-russia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberwar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the world took pause to consider the implications of Operation Aurora, and Google lent considerable voice to the concept of Advanced and Persistent Threats (APT), we can ill-afford to believe even for a moment that they are alone in their sophistication or capability.   According to the FBI more than 100 nations have offensive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/18/move-over-china-here-comes-russia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Competitor Hype and Bull &#8211; It&#039;s the Analytics Stupid!</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/10/28/competitor-hype-and-bull/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/10/28/competitor-hype-and-bull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitor Hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eddie schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at the CSI show yesterday and was within earshot of one of our “competitors” who claimed that they were winning against NetWitness because they support 10Gbps and we do not.   I have heard this story frequently from this particular firm, and it’s a bunch of bull.
It amazes me that companies in this space, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/10/28/competitor-hype-and-bull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers Swipe Information on Job Seekers From Monster.Com</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/01/26/hackers-swipe-information-on-job-seekers-from-monstercom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/01/26/hackers-swipe-information-on-job-seekers-from-monstercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the second time in 18 months, Monster.Com has suffered a massive security breach.  In both cases, user account information was stolen, along with the email addresses and names of job seekers.  When this happened in August of 2007, 1.3 Million accounts were taken when an employee of the company divulged his credentials via a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/01/26/hackers-swipe-information-on-job-seekers-from-monstercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Largest Ever Cyber Breach Reported by Heartland Payment Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/01/21/largest-ever-cyber-breach-reported-by-heartland-payment-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/01/21/largest-ever-cyber-breach-reported-by-heartland-payment-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Leakage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have dined out at a local family restaurant in the past few months, or perhaps paid for books for your college-bound kids, or even paid for gasoline at the pumps with a credit card, you may have inadvertently allowed hackers to steal your credit card number during the transaction phase that takes place [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/01/21/largest-ever-cyber-breach-reported-by-heartland-payment-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PCI Alone Will Not Stop the Data Losses</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2008/04/23/pci-alone-will-not-stop-the-data-losses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2008/04/23/pci-alone-will-not-stop-the-data-losses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 04:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent public disclosures at Hannaford Bros of millions of credit card numbers lost to professional carder gangs again raises questions regarding the state of preparedness of retail security and other industries to protect customer data in the current cyber threat environment.  In the case of Hannaford, these gangs may have followed a pattern familiar [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2008/04/23/pci-alone-will-not-stop-the-data-losses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
