<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Network Forensics Blog &#187; trojan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkforensics.com/category/trojan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkforensics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<div id='fb-root'></div>
					<script>
						window.fbAsyncInit = function()
						{
							FB.init({appId: null, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});
						};
						(function()
						{
							var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;
							e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';
							document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);
						}());
					</script>	
						<item>
		<title>Using WinDbg to Begin Reverse Engineering Unknown Malware from Memory</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2011/06/13/using-windbg-to-begin-reverse-engineering-unknown-malware-from-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2011/06/13/using-windbg-to-begin-reverse-engineering-unknown-malware-from-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 03:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Golomb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PE EXE files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part Two in a multi-part series on holistic, multi-disciplinary analysis and reversing. &#160; The last post, &#8220;Mutex Analysis: The Canary in the Coal Mine,&#8221; started off showing to use mutexes to discover malware that is difficult to locate using more traditional methods and tools. We used a live compromised system for the example and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2011/06/13/using-windbg-to-begin-reverse-engineering-unknown-malware-from-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mutex Analysis: The Canary in the Coal Mine (and Discovering New Families of Malware?)</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2011/06/11/mutex-analysis-the-canary-in-the-coal-mine-and-discovering-new-families-of-malware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2011/06/11/mutex-analysis-the-canary-in-the-coal-mine-and-discovering-new-families-of-malware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Golomb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part One in a multi-part series on holistic, multi-disciplinary analysis and reversing. This post is based on a presentation I gave at the last Thotcon, but was really prompted by a case from a couple days ago. It&#8217;s an interesting example of how the same disciplined methodologies for finding malicious traffic on the network also [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2011/06/11/mutex-analysis-the-canary-in-the-coal-mine-and-discovering-new-families-of-malware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Identifying the country of origin for a malware PE executable</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/25/identifying-the-country-of-origin-for-a-malware-pe-executable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/25/identifying-the-country-of-origin-for-a-malware-pe-executable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Golomb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PE EXE files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 11/29/10: Added a short discussion about non-malware executables also. Have you ever wondered how people writing reports about malware can say where the malware was likely developed? Sometimes you get totally lucky and log files created by the malware will help answer the question. Given the following line from a log: 11/16/2009 6:41:48 PM [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/25/identifying-the-country-of-origin-for-a-malware-pe-executable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Forensics and Reversing Part 1 &#8211; gzip web content, java malware, and a little JavaScript</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/14/network-forensics-and-reversing-part-1-gzip-web-content-java-malware-and-a-little-javascript/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/14/network-forensics-and-reversing-part-1-gzip-web-content-java-malware-and-a-little-javascript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Golomb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decompile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NetWitness Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obfuscated traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something I’ve found unsettling for some time now is the drastically increased usage of gzip as a Content-Encoding transfer type from web servers. By default now, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia, and many other organizations compress the content they send to your users. From that list alone, you can infer that most of the HTTP [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/14/network-forensics-and-reversing-part-1-gzip-web-content-java-malware-and-a-little-javascript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bredolab Takedown – Just the tip of the Iceberg</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/04/bredolab-takedown-%e2%80%93-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/04/bredolab-takedown-%e2%80%93-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post discusses the Bredolab trojan and the findings from a 3-month NetWitness investigation which clearly show that Bredolab is much, much more than an advanced trojan threat. Bredolab is actually part of a multi-faceted profit center leveraging dynamic techniques to stay ahead of detection systems such as anti-virus and serve multiple constituencies' criminal activities.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/11/04/bredolab-takedown-%e2%80%93-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Malware!</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/10/18/its-malware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/10/18/its-malware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary Golomb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitor Hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zeus is evolving. In regards to a new release, one Anti-Virus vendor recently noted: “[the new exe] uses techniques designed to avoid automatic heuristics-based detection.” The discussion then proceeds to examine how the exe is different from previous versions of the malware. Should we be alarmed that Zeus is getting so sophisticated that it evades [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/10/18/its-malware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They are watching you&#8230;and your security vendors.</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/05/30/they-are-watching-you-and-your-security-vendors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/05/30/they-are-watching-you-and-your-security-vendors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 13:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluehost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[godaddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gumblar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostgator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martuz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;ve ever seen me, or any of the NetWitness crew, speak on malware, advanced threats or the current threat environment, you&#8217;ll generally hear more than one recurring theme, one of which is: Your anti-virus solution isn&#8217;t working like you think it is. This is occurring for a variety of reasons and is ultimately the result of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/05/30/they-are-watching-you-and-your-security-vendors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kneber Update</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/19/kneber-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/19/kneber-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitor Hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kneber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a significant amount of coverage yesterday on research performed by NetWitness into a large set of stolen information recovered from a ZeuS botnet.  Some of the information, analysis, and commentary was very beneficial to the broader discussion of threats such as these.  There is, however, some information that we feel we should address. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/19/kneber-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

