<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Network Forensics Blog &#187; adobe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkforensics.com/tag/adobe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkforensics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<div id='fb-root'></div>
					<script>
						window.fbAsyncInit = function()
						{
							FB.init({appId: null, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});
						};
						(function()
						{
							var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;
							e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';
							document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);
						}());
					</script>	
						<item>
		<title>Finding Aurora (googlehack)</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/01/15/finding-aurora-googlehack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/01/15/finding-aurora-googlehack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was helping a fortune customer yesterday determine if they were targeted by Operation Aurora. From everything we know to date, they were not. How do we know this? We looked. In 15 minutes or so, we looked back over the last 6 months of every bit and byte that has left that company, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/01/15/finding-aurora-googlehack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe announces new vulnerability in Adobe 9 Software After Reports of Zero Day Exploits</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/02/20/adobe-announces-new-vulnerability-in-adobe-9-software-after-reports-of-zero-day-exploits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/02/20/adobe-announces-new-vulnerability-in-adobe-9-software-after-reports-of-zero-day-exploits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insider Threat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 19th, Adobe confirmed reports that its version 9 software of Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Reader were vulnerable to buffer overflows that have allowed some companies to be targeted in spearphishing attacks. Their announcement said: A critical vulnerability has been identified in Adobe Reader 9 and Acrobat 9 and earlier versions. This vulnerability would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/02/20/adobe-announces-new-vulnerability-in-adobe-9-software-after-reports-of-zero-day-exploits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

