<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Network Forensics Blog &#187; Situational Awareness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.networkforensics.com/tag/situational-awareness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.networkforensics.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<div id='fb-root'></div>
					<script>
						window.fbAsyncInit = function()
						{
							FB.init({appId: null, status: true, cookie: true, xfbml: true});
						};
						(function()
						{
							var e = document.createElement('script'); e.async = true;
							e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js';
							document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e);
						}());
					</script>	
						<item>
		<title>There is an &#8220;O&#8221;  in I/O &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/04/28/there-is-an-o-in-io/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/04/28/there-is-an-o-in-io/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competitor Hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent a good amount of time this week speaking to customers, partners and prospects about deploying, engineering and using our products &#8212; one topic that always seems to be part of the discussion is system throughput and scalability.  Of course our position regarding this is clear, as NetWitness technology was designed from inception to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/04/28/there-is-an-o-in-io/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyberwar Or Not Cyberwar? And Why That is The Question</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/03/26/cyberwar-or-not-cyberwar-and-why-that-is-the-question/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/03/26/cyberwar-or-not-cyberwar-and-why-that-is-the-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amit Yoran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberwar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past two months, there has been a tremendous amount of chatter in the security community about the term ‘cyberwar’ and whether or not the US is engaged in a cyberwar. Mike McConnell (former Director of National Intelligence) wrote a pointed op-ed for The Washington Post claiming that, “The United States is fighting a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/03/26/cyberwar-or-not-cyberwar-and-why-that-is-the-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kneber Update</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/19/kneber-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/19/kneber-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitor Hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trojan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kneber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a significant amount of coverage yesterday on research performed by NetWitness into a large set of stolen information recovered from a ZeuS botnet.  Some of the information, analysis, and commentary was very beneficial to the broader discussion of threats such as these.  There is, however, some information that we feel we should address. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/19/kneber-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Move over China, here comes Russia</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/18/move-over-china-here-comes-russia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/18/move-over-china-here-comes-russia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberwar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the world took pause to consider the implications of Operation Aurora, and Google lent considerable voice to the concept of Advanced and Persistent Threats (APT), we can ill-afford to believe even for a moment that they are alone in their sophistication or capability.   According to the FBI more than 100 nations have offensive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/18/move-over-china-here-comes-russia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Forensics ca. 1999</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/02/network-forensics-ca-1999/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/02/network-forensics-ca-1999/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competitor Hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network forensics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.networkforensics.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s a little known fact that NetWitness has been innovating in the security field for over 11 years, which was further validated by the announcement of our recently granted US Patent # 7,634,557. Clearly, when it comes to network analysis we do it better than anyone else, and it’s really the only way to get [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/02/02/network-forensics-ca-1999/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finding Aurora (googlehack)</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/01/15/finding-aurora-googlehack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/01/15/finding-aurora-googlehack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was helping a fortune customer yesterday determine if they were targeted by Operation Aurora. From everything we know to date, they were not. How do we know this? We looked. In 15 minutes or so, we looked back over the last 6 months of every bit and byte that has left that company, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2010/01/15/finding-aurora-googlehack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Competitor Hype and Bull &#8211; It&#039;s the Analytics Stupid!</title>
		<link>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/10/28/competitor-hype-and-bull/</link>
		<comments>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/10/28/competitor-hype-and-bull/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Schwartz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advanced Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitor Hype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Visbility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eddie schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Situational Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netwitness.com/blog/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was at the CSI show yesterday and was within earshot of one of our “competitors” who claimed that they were winning against NetWitness because they support 10Gbps and we do not.   I have heard this story frequently from this particular firm, and it’s a bunch of bull. It amazes me that companies in this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.networkforensics.com/2009/10/28/competitor-hype-and-bull/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

